The Scalability Of Windows Azure
Cloud-computing providers in general and Windows Azure in particular offer nearly infinite scalability, virtually unlimited capacity, blazing performance and extremely quick provision times. However, to properly take advantage of these great benefits, teams need to plan ahead and understand all potential pitfalls and challenges. One of the more significant differences between development of on-premise applications and cloud applications is a rather direct correlation between choices made during construction of an application and its support costs after deployment. Because of the Windows Azure pricing model, every inefficient architectural decision and every inefficient line of code will show up as an extra line item on your Azure invoice.
This article will focus on a few actionable items that you can do today to minimize the cost of your Windows Azure application tomorrow. The list of items is by no means exhaustive, but it will get you and your team thinking about the impact of your choices in a new dimension.
First, let’s analyze the popular moving blocks when it comes to Windows Azure pricing. While seemingly straightforward individually, it is their combination together – and with obvious influence of already existing non-functional requirements for scalability, performance, security, availability, etc. – that make architecture in the cloud be a complex jigsaw puzzle.
- Compute hours – quantity and size of nodes (servers) and charged by hour when online
- Transfer costs – data that crosses Microsoft’s data center boundaries is subject to transfer charges.
- Azure Table Storage (ATS) costs – charge by gigabyte per month for the amount of space used
- ATS transaction costs – charges for the amount of requests to ATS your application will make
- Size of the SQL Azure databases – every database that you host in SQL Azure is charged by size
There are costs for other less frequently used services like Azure AppFabric or Content Delivery Network (CDN) that are not covered in this article.
Tip 1 – Avoid crossing data center boundaries
This is fairly straightforward. Data that does not leave Microsoft data center is not subject to Transfer charges. Keep your communication between compute nodes, SQL Azure, and Table Storage within the same data center as much as possible. This is especially important for applications distributed among multiple geo-locations. If you must communicate between different geo-locations, limit communication to non-transactional, batch calls that occur less frequently while utilizing compression where it makes sense to cut down on the amount of data transferred. Employ caching technologies where possible.
Tip 2 – Minimize the number of compute hours by using auto scaling
Compute hours will likely make up the largest part of your Azure bill and thus need to receive the greatest amount of attention. It is important to remember that Windows Azure does not automatically scale down the number of compute nodes, even if there is little or no demand on your application. Architect for and plan to have an automatic scaling strategy in place, where the amount of nodes increases when demand spikes up and decreases when demand tapers off. This can easily cut your bill for compute hours in half. Implementing a comprehensive auto-scaling engine can be more complex than it sounds. While there are a number of open-source examples that show the basics of how this can be done, it is also a perfect opportunity to outsource the auto-scaling to third party services such as AzureWatch.
In order for auto-scaling to be most effective, group your system components by their scaling strategies into Azure Roles. It is important to keep in mind that if you need high availability of your components and want to take advantage of Azure SLA, you will need to maintain at least two online nodes for each Azure Role you have deployed.
Tip 3 – Use both Azure Table Storage (ATS) and SQL Azure
Try to not limit yourself to a choice between ATS or SQL Azure. Instead, it would be best to figure out when to use both together to your advantage. This is likely to be one of the tougher decisions that architects will need to make, as there are many compromises between relational storage of SQL Azure and highly scalable storage of ATS. Neither technology is perfect for every situation.
On one hand accessing SQL Azure from within the boundaries of a data center is free and SQL Azure offers a familiar relational model which most developers will be comfortable with, transactions that assure data integrity, integration with popular ORM frameworks such as Entity Framework or NHibernate, and compatibility with numerous tools that work with relational databases. On the other hand, ATS offers vastly greater scalability than SQL Azure and can hold a nearly infinite amount of data at a fraction of SQL Azure’s cost. You are charged, however, for every request made to ATS, even within the boundaries of a data center.
From a cost perspective, SQL Azure makes sense when access to data is not required to be highly scalable and when the amount of data is limited. ATS makes sense for large amounts of data or when serious scalability is needed.
Tip 4 – ATS table modeling
If you have made the choice to use Azure Table Storage, you have essentially committed to converting parts of your data access components into mini database servers. Setting Blob storage aside which is primarily used for media files or documents, ATS provides three levels of data hierarchy (Table, PartitionKey, and RowKey) that can be accessed and navigated extremely efficiently. However, anything beyond that will require custom code and CPU cycles of your compute nodes. This is the key difference to work around. It would be prudent to spend a significant amount of time modeling table storage with appropriate Blobs, Tables, PartitionKeys and RowKeys to accommodate for efficient data storage and retrieval strategies. This will not only speed up your transactions and minimize the amount of data transferred in and out of ATS, but also reduce the burden on you compute nodes that will be required to manipulate data and directly translate into cost savings across the board.
Tip 5 – Data purging in ATS
Because you are charged for every gigabyte stored in ATS, it may be prudent to have a data purging strategy. However, while it may seem like a straightforward problem in a world of relational databases, this is not the case with ATS. Since ATS is not relational, deletion of each and every row from an ATS table requires two transactions. In certain cases it may be possible to delete a single row using only one transaction. Either way, this is extremely slow, inefficient and expensive. A better way would be to partition a single table into multiple versions (e.g. Sales2010, Sales2011, Sales2012, etc.) and purge obsolete data by deleting a version of a table at a time.
Shift to cloud computing represents a major leap forward and enables almost everyone, from small companies to large enterprise, reduce their capital expenses, minimize time to market and significantly decrease support costs. By investing even small effort into planning ahead, cloud computing can result in meaningful savings and benefits.
By Igor Papirov / Paraleap Technologies
- The Lighter Side Of The Cloud -The Thrill Seeker - December 2, 2016
- A Resilient Cloud Strategy: Standardize or Diversify? - December 1, 2016
- Autonomous Vehicles – Are European Drivers Ready To Go Driverless? - December 1, 2016
- IIA Report Infographic: Mobile Shopping Statistics - November 29, 2016
- Sports Data Analytics and the National Hockey League (NHL) - November 28, 2016