Eirikur Hrafnsson

Green Cloud Computing – Green Power Usage Effectiveness

 

A few years back the Green Grid developed the Power Usage Effectiveness metric or PUE for short to measure a data centers’ effectiveness of getting power to IT equipment. What the PUE tells you in simple terms is how much extra energy you need for each usable KWh for the IT equipment due to the power going into cooling, power distribution loss etc. and it’s a simple formula (in theory):

PUE = Total Facility Power/IT Equipment Power

However the PUE “standard” has been the center of the data center industries’ debate ever since it came out. I won’t go into the details but it has been debated mainly for four reasons.

  1. The PUE can change dramatically depending on where measurements are made, when they are made and the timespan the measurements are made in.
  2. Data centers are subtracting factors from their PUE to lower it e.g. district heating.
  3. PUE was designed for dedicated data centers (preferably full of gear) but being calculated for any kind of “data center”.
  4. PUE was NOT designed as a metric to compare data centers for business purposes (My PUE is smaller then yours!) but as a metric for data centers to improve their effective use of power.

In other words PUE has loopholes and they are being exploited for marketing purposes. Green Grid has decided to plug most of those holes with an update to the PUE definition and are now calling it PUEx where the x is a value between 0-3 and depends on e.g. where measurements are made. You can read more about the PUEx here .

PUEx is a welcomed update and I hope data centers will soon start updating their PUE’s. I still have a beef to pick with the marketing departments of the data centers though because I don’t see them stopping to use PUE as tool to compare their “green” data center to others. The age of “Green by PUE” has just started, believe me!

This article about “Chicago emerging as a green data center powerhouse” is exactly the sort of “greenwashing” we have been spotting here at Greenqloud. Microsoft has a massive “green” data center in Chicago that they say has a PUE of 1.22, sounds pretty great right? But wait…where does their power come from? 72.8% coal, 22.3% nuclear, 3.8% mixed, 1.1% renewable…still sounds green to you? Me neither and we feel like something has to be done. PUE rightfully does not change with the amount of renewables used. It simply isn’t a metric about true greeness but how well you manage your power and therefor should not be used for green marketing.

However, PUE IS being used for green marketing and realistically I don’t think that will change for a while. We therefor came up with a way to “weigh” the PUE to better see which data centers are truly green in the sense that they indirectly cause the least amount of CO2 to be emitted by their use of dirty or clean energy.

This new metric we call GPUE or Green Power Usage Effectiveness and it does two things for the industry.

  1. It gives the truly green data centers a boost in the battle with their “greenwashing” counterparts.
  2. You can very easily calculate the CO2 emissions created for each usable KWh for the IT equipment.

So here’s the definition and the presentation format for GPUE:

GPUE = G x PUEx (for inline comparison of data centers)
or = G @ PUEx  (a better display and for co2 emission calculations)

The “G” is the key factor here and it is a simple calculated value:

G = Weighed Sum of energy sources and their lifecycle KG CO2/KWh

G =∑( %EnergySource x ( 1 + weight) )

What’s the + 1 for? It’s there so we when “weigh”(multiply) the PUE we get a number that’s not less then the PUE. This gives us a better feeling of the scale because we are used to the small PUE value range.
The weights are simply taken directly from the “lifecycle CO2/KWh for electricity generation by power source” table above we got from the 2008 Sovacool Study e.g. the weight for unscrubbed coal is 1.050 (kg of CO2/KWh) while hydroelectric river generation has a weight of 0.013. An unknown energy source or a “mix” will get the same as the maximum value which for now is the same as coal.

Example:

PUE 1.20, 50/50 Coal/Hydro
G = 0.5*(1+1.050) + 0.5*(1+0.013)
G = 1.531, GPUEx =
1.84 or 1.531@1.20

Kg CO2 per usable KWh = (G-1) x PUEx = 0.64 Kg

It’s very interesting to see the GPUE side by side to the PUE of these “green” data centers in the image below (click for a large version). This table is mostly taken from the Greenpeace report “Make IT Green“. You will notice the percentages don’t quite add up, that’s because these are the local grid suppliers, the rest is what we call a “mix”. Some of those data centers also didn’t have a public PUE (underlined) so for demonstration purposes we gave them a PUE of 1.5 and did the calculations. Greenqloud’s data centers don’t have their PUE yet but from Icelandic experience and the free cooling here we are certain that they will at least be under 1.2 and because we only use 100% renewable energy (geothermal and hydro) for our truly green public cloud our GPUE will roughly be equal our PUEx and that’s the point. Truly green data centers will have a GPUE close to their PUEx and dirty energy data centers won’t, let the debate begin!

By Eirikur Hrafnsson

THE TRULY GREEN CLOUD HAS A BLOG

Green Power Usage Effectiveness

Share on Facebook
Post to Google Buzz
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on Tumblr
Share on reddit
Share on LinkedIn
Share on StumbleUpon

 

The ICT industry is putting out 2% of the world’s CO2 emissions, equal to the airline industry (Gartner) and could become one of the biggest polluters by 2020 (McKinsey).

Eirikur Hrafnsson

Technical Director @ NetApp -- formerly Co-Founder of GreenQloud acquired by NetApp.

For the last two decades and a half I've been in the role of a startup executive, founder, manager, product lead, UX director, lead developer, board member, investor, clean tech advocate, hardware hacker, professional singer and sporadic public speaker.

Now on an epic journey with NetApp to deliver the true potential of hybrid cloud...

CONTRIBUTORS

What You Need To Know About Choosing A Cloud Service Provider

What You Need To Know About Choosing A Cloud Service Provider

Selecting The Right Cloud Services Provider How to find the right partner for cloud adoption on an enterprise scale The ...
The Fully Aware, Hybrid-Cloud Approach

The Fully Aware, Hybrid-Cloud Approach

Hybrid-Cloud Approach For over 20 years, organizations have been attempting to secure their networks and protect their data. However, have ...
The Cure for Cloud Sprawl: Nimble Operationalization in the Multi-Cloud

The Cure for Cloud Sprawl: Nimble Operationalization in the Multi-Cloud

The Cure for Cloud Sprawl Enterprises are shifting to a cloud-first footing. That’s no secret. But just as companies and ...
Beacons Flopped, But They’re About to Flourish in the Future

Beacons Flopped, But They’re About to Flourish in the Future

Cloud Beacons Flying High When Apple debuted cloud beacons in 2013, analysts predicted 250 million devices capable of serving as ...
Driving Transformation? It is possible to predict the future.

Driving Transformation? It is possible to predict the future.

Driving Transformation Previously, I wrote about the criticality of defining the Vision for your transformation - what is your real objective, how ...
IoT Security Intel

Cyber IoT Security: McAfee on Threats and Autonomous Cars

IoT Security Autonomous cars are just around the corner, there have been IoT security controversies surrounding their safety, and a ...
Critical Success Factors when shifting Workloads into the Cloud

Critical Success Factors when shifting Workloads into the Cloud

Shifting Workloads into the Cloud By 2020, 92 percent of all workloads will reside in the cloud. Yet challenges remain ...
3 Challenges of Network Deployment in Hyperconverged Infrastructure

3 Challenges of Network Deployment in Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Hyperconverged Infrastructure In this article, we’ll explore three challenges that are associated with network deployment in a hyperconverged private cloud environment, ...
Open APIs Alone Won’t Change Banking

Open APIs Alone Won’t Change Banking

Open Banking API's Most people think of banks as one monolithic entity, but they are actually made up of hundreds ...
Digital Identity Trends 2017 – Previewing The Year Ahead

Digital Identity Trends 2017 – Previewing The Year Ahead

Digital Identity Trends 2017 The lack of security of the Internet of Things captured public attention this year as massive ...