The Evolution of Venture Capital – Matt Keezer vs George Doriot

The Evolution of Venture Capital

It was the general consensus in the aftermath of World War II that the US would fall back into depression. US government bonds were only yielding 2% at best, and many investors were willing to accept that. However, some were not, and this is when Venture Capitalism in its current form was born – prior to the war, Venture Capital investments came from wealthy family groups like the Rockefellers.

Georges Doriot, who many consider to be the “Father of Venture Capital”, was one of first to create a non-family based venture model with the founding of the American Research and Development Corporation (ARD). ARD’s early investment record is typical of more traditional models of venture capital; they had a few failed ventures (e.g. Island Packers – tuna fish packing), a few that produced modest returns (e.g. Tracer Labs), and one investment replenished the fund of all its losses (Digital Equipment – a chip manufacturer). ARD based all their investments on the idea of “taking calculated risks in select [growth] companies”, whilst still looking for companies that had passed key landmarks, such as having passed the test tube stage, with patent or IP protection.

In the spring of 1961, Doriot gave a talk (that later became a book) which he titled ‘Creative Capital’, that outlined the optimum model for Venture Capital investment; one that he had built over the past 15 years. Doriot’s thoughts on venture investing were that:

  • The best returns on investment were from the riskiest companies – often start-ups that had to be built from scratch
  • The strongest companies were not a result of overnight success – they were developed over time
  • The most lucrative areas for investment were in specialized tech – patents and know-how allowed smaller companies to be competitive with large corporations
  • The most difficult part of the job was convincing entrepreneurs to take outside help, regardless of whether it was for generating sales, getting a bank credit line, or hiring the right team.

Venture Capital Landscape

Over the past quarter of a century the Venture Capital landscape has changed considerably. The cost of starting a company has dropped considerably, from $2 million in the late 90s to little more than the cost of running a website today. This development means that serious venture investment is no longer required in the early stages of a start-up – micro ventures and crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter have stepped in to fill that investment void.

So where does that leave traditional venture capital? ‘Old school’ Venture Capital firms with 10-year investment vehicles, that tend to yield mediocre returns, are starting to realise that money is a commodity. Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures has even predicted that venture capital in its current iteration won’t be around in ten years.

However, there are a small number of more modern Venture Capitalist firms that are trying to find newer, more innovative, and ultimately more profitable ways of investing. Matt Keezer, CEO at Momentum Ventures, has been attempting to bring Venture Capital into the 21st century, with his very own three pronged approach to modern investment:

  1. Find and identify an industry that you are actually passionate about and are ready to immerse yourself in.
  2. Look at businesses within that industry that are doing well now and that will continue to do well in the future.
  3. Determine whether or not you have a reasonable entry point into that industry.

In contrast to George Doriot’s Venture Capitalist model, Matt and Momentum Ventures don’t buy into the notion that there has to be high levels of risk to foster true innovation and success. In a previous interview with CloudTweaks he commented,

I have a hard time not feeling bad for the entrepreneurs spending their time and careers on a failing project. However, some believe that this extreme level of risk is necessary for true innovation. I disagree with that notion.

Momentum Ventures have committed themselves to trying to reduce the risk that is somewhat intertwined with Venture Capital investment, they take pride in being what Keezer calls an “anti-venture capital” firm. They are attempting to bridge the divide between Venture Capital and the process of building a strong and reliable business, a divide that seems illogical in its conception. Crowdfunding and the rise of the internet has forced Venture Capital to grow and adapt, as there is nothing to suggest that the incentives that drive their investment have disappeared.

(Sponsored series via Momentum Venture)

By Josh Hamilton

Robots

How DSPs can Improve Straight Through Processing Rate in RPA Implementations by up to 82%

Robotic Process Automation Digital Service Providers (DSPs) today are well placed to take advantage of next-generation technologies like Robotic Process Automation (RPA), Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence. As most of the smart DSPs have already ...
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)

The Rise Of The Corporate VPN

The Rise Of The Corporate VPN Over the past few years, VPNs have become increasingly widely used by the general public. Initially, they were used exclusively by the tech-savvy and privacy obsessed, but as the ...
Virtana

Episode 8: Managing Cloud Strategy During the Chaos of 2020, Plus an Outlook for 2021

An Interview with Kash Shaikh, CEO of Virtana Companies are wrestling with the idea of moving to the cloud, staying on-prem or finding a hybrid solution. Kash Shaikh, the new CEO of Virtana, looks at ...
Alex Brisbourne

Industrial IoT Cyberattacks Continue To Rise

IoT Industrial Security The Internet of Things (IoT) includes both traditional electronics and everyday ‘things’ embedded with sensors, computing, and networking capabilities. From smart coffee makers and smart homes to smart lighting and smart cities, ...
Ronald van Loon

Getting Future Ready with a Modernized Hybrid Cloud Environment

Getting Future Ready Hybrid cloud is the foundation in which modernized organizations are built, and organizations need a modern platform and infrastructure to get the most out of their hybrid cloud environments. Organizations need to ...

PROXY SERVICES

The CloudTweaks technology lists will include updated resources to leading services from around the globe. Examples include leading IT Monitoring Services, Bootcamps, VPNs, CDNs, Reseller Programs and much more...

  • Smartproxy

    Smartproxy

    Smartproxy is a rising star in the constantly growing proxy market. Smartproxy offers awarded customer service, impressive performance, and is serious about your anonymity (yes, cybersecurity matters). The latest features developed by Smartproxy are 30 minute long sticky sessions and Google Proxies. Rumor has it, the latter guarantee 100% success rate

  • Bright Data

    Bright Data

    Bright Data’s network is one of the most robust of its kind globally. Here are its stark advantages: Extremely stable connection for long sessions (99.99% uptime guaranteed). Free to integrate with our Proxy Manager which allows you to define custom rules for optimized results. Send unlimited concurrent requests increasing speed, cost-effectiveness, and overall efficiency.

  • Rsocks

    Rsocks

    RSocks team offers a huge amount of residential plans which were developed for plenty of tasks and, most importantly, has been proved to be quite efficient. Such variety has been created on purpose to let everyone choose a plan for a reasonable price, online, rotation and other parameters.

  • Storm Proxies

    Storm Proxies

    Storm Proxies' network is optimized for high performance and fast multi-threaded tools. You get unlimited bandwidth. No hidden costs, no limits on bandwidth. Try Storm Proxies 100% Risk Free. If you are not happy with the service email us within 24 hours of purchase and we will refund you.