Machine Augmented Humans: Does Elon Have A Point?

Machine Augmented Humans

Elon Musk may have caused controversy once again with his declaration that humans must merge with machines, or become irrelevant. For anyone who follows Musk’s career, or tech news in general, this is not a new or shocking statement, ideas like this have been around for decades, and this isn’t even the first time Musk has made this kind of claim – in fact he is becoming well known for it. On the surface this may seem a far-fetched idea, rooted in the furthest reaches of sci-fi fiction, yet the premise is based on a logical string of ideas (however futuristic they may seem).

As AI becomes more and more sophisticated, and automation becomes increasingly more efficient and cost effective, human workers are becoming increasingly less valuable. The next few decades are going to see mass layoffs in favour of automation, and while the scale of these layoffs will depend on just how receptive the public are to these futuristic ideas, many working class jobs are going to be eliminated. Transport will likely be the first to go, alongside manufacturing, with some commentators suggesting that driverless cars could leave all 4.4 million people who work as drivers utterly redundant. But as AI improves, there are very few careers that will not be affected by the Machine Learning revolution – a report released last month by the McKinsey Global Institute predicted that around 50 percent of work today could be automated by 2055 (you can check out this search portal to find out how likely you are to be sacked for a robot).

Machine Augmented

When addressing the World Government Summit last week, he stated that as we progress “there will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot can’t do better.” Rather than see this as a horrific dystopian future, Musk argues that this is an opportunity, a chance for the human race to take a monumental leap forwards, or risk being condemned to the annals of history as the secondary race on earth, behind AI robots – he famously said that without these advancements humanity runs the risk of becoming mere “house cats” to artificial intelligence. He believes that humanity must become “cyborgs” in order to stay relevant in an AI driven future, through a “merger of biological intelligence and machine intelligence” humanity can remain the dominant force in the economy.

The theory is relatively simple; once we have a better understanding of how the brain works and we are able to map and track neural activity it will be possible to create “neuroproesthetics” that could supplement and enhance our brain power. Musk has been openly working on such a project, and has discussed an injectable mesh-like “neural lace”, that could digitally enhance the brain’s memory, processing power, or even give you night vision! This is not a new idea either, the term was originally coined by sci-fi author Iain M. Banks in his Culture series, while a few years back, a team of nanotechnologists at Harvard University published a paper called “Syringe-injectable electronics” which discussed an ultra-fine electronic mesh. This mesh would be injected into the brains of mice to monitor brain activity and treat degenerative diseases, with the ultimate goal being transferring this technology to the human mind.

You could look at the “neural lace” like a extension of the mind, in the same way exo-skeletons are extensions of the body – military scientists around the world have been working and perfecting this idea over the last decade. Man and machine work in tandem, combining the strength of a machine with the control and dexterity of a human – so how is a neural lace different? It is the idea that a machine has access to the very inner-workings of your mind that makes many so uncomfortable – our mind is the only space that we alone occupy, so the possibility of mechanically altering that space scares a great many people. However, Musk argues that by augmenting human minds with digital enhancements we get the best of both worlds, that the neural lace could simply unleash the potential of the human mind like another step in evolution.

This “best of both worlds” approach may be admirable and optimistic but there are many concerns associated with this level of human and technological integration. There are the obvious health risks for early users of the technology, were it to be rushed through to keep up with the march of AI progress, as well as the fears that by altering your mind, you may somehow become less human. Would you trade your humanity for a little extra brain power?

By Josh Hamilton

Doug Hazelman Cloudberry

Managing an Increasingly Complex IT Environment

Managing Complex IT Environments The hybrid work model is here to stay—at least for the time being. That’s how things feel in these still uncertain times. This new way of work that has evolved from ...
Alex Tkatch

Dare to Innovate: 3 Best Practices for Designing and Executing a New Product Launch

Best Practices for Designing and Executing a Product Launch Nothing in entrepreneurial life is more exciting, frustrating, time-consuming and uncertain than launching a new product. Creating something new and different can be exhilarating, assuming everything ...
Derrek Schutman

Providing Robust Digital Capabilities by Building a Digital Enablement Layer

Building a Digital Enablement Layer Most Digital Service Providers (DSPs) aim to provide digital capabilities to customers but struggle to transform with legacy O/BSS systems. According to McKinsey research, 70% of digital transformation projects don’t ...
James Crowley

Does Open-Source Software Hold the Key to Data Security?

Open-Source Software Data Security Whether you realize it or not, open-source software is everywhere in our everyday tech, from mobile phones to air travel, from streaming Netflix to space exploration. Open-source software has played a ...
Martin Mendelsohn

Of Rogues, Fear and Chicanery: The Colonial Pipeline Dilemma and CISO/CSO Priorities

The Colonial Pipeline Dilemma The Colonial Pipeline is one of a number of essential energy and infrastructure assets that have been recently targeted by the global ransomware group DarkSide, and other aspiring non-state actors, with ...

CLOUD MONITORING

The CloudTweaks technology lists will include updated resources to leading services from around the globe. Examples include leading IT Monitoring Services, Bootcamps, VPNs, CDNs, Reseller Programs and much more...

  • Opsview

    Opsview

    Opsview is a global privately held IT Systems Management software company whose core product, Opsview Enterprise was released in 2009. The company has offices in the UK and USA, boasting some 35,000 corporate clients. Their prominent clients include Cisco, MIT, Allianz, NewVoiceMedia, Active Network, and University of Surrey.

  • Nagios

    Nagios

    Nagios is one of the leading vendors of IT monitoring and management tools offering cloud monitoring capabilities for AWS, EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) and S3 (Simple Storage Service). Their products include infrastructure, server, and network monitoring solutions like Nagios XI, Nagios Log Server, and Nagios Network Analyzer.

  • Datadog

    DataDog

    DataDog is a startup based out of New York which secured $31 Million in series C funding. They are quickly making a name for themselves and have a truly impressive client list with the likes of Adobe, Salesforce, HP, Facebook and many others.

  • Sematext Logo

    Sematext

    Sematext bridges the gap between performance monitoring, real user monitoring, transaction tracing, and logs. Sematext all-in-one monitoring platform gives businesses full-stack visibility by exposing logs, metrics, and traces through a single Cloud or On-Premise solution. Sematext helps smart DevOps teams move faster.