Jedi Blue: The Secret Agreement Between Facebook and Google

Jedi Blue: The Secret Agreement

With Facebook currently embroiled in an ever-increasing number of scandals, including whistleblowers, censorship accusations, a buried report on mental health issues, and endless data leaks, they’ve chosen to rebrand as “Meta”. But this new name doesn’t change the fact that they are becoming more and more powerful.

There have been a number of demands through the years to break up some of these big tech monopolies. Facebook/Meta now own Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, Alphabet are the proprietors of Google and YouTube, and Amazon have basically sown up the web hosting world.

However, there is a need to not confuse monopolies with popularity. Alan Reynolds of the Cato Institute explains:

“Facebook, likewise, is not a monopoly because it has more users than Snapchat or Twitter. Amazon is not a monopoly because its online sales — but not total sales — are larger than Walmart’s. Apple is not a monopoly because its cellphone operating system is more popular than Google’s in the U.S. (but not the world). And the Google Chrome browser is not a monopoly because it is currently more popular than Microsoft Edge (my personal favorite) or Apple Safari. You get the picture.”

However, a series of court filings have revealed to the world that Facebook and Google may have been rigging the online advertising market for themselves. Naturally, a Google spokesperson said the claims in the suit are “baseless” and riddled with inaccuracies.” So what exactly have they been doing?

In March 2017, Facebook announced that it was going to back “header bidding” – it’s a third party advertising technology which was attempting to challenge Google’s adtech dominance. But within a year, Facebook had done a U-turn. Google and Facebook had discreetly agreed that they would use Google’s system for managing online ads – they would also not pursue competing ad technologies or to use header bidding. In return, Google would give Facebook preferential rates and first dibs on prime ad placement.

Google and Facebook had cornered the market, allowing them to continue to reap billions in annual revenue – they both got what they wanted from the deal and were keeping out pesky competitors. Facebook even agreed to try to win 10% of the ad auctions in which it participated – potentially worth hundreds of millions of dollars for Google – whilst they saved hundreds of millions in development costs for a competitor program.

But, there’s a fair chance this is illegal. According to Section 2 of the Sherman Act, “Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony.” 

To monopolize something means “the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident.” 

Sounds rather similar to what Facebook and Google were up to in agreeing to dump header bidding and give preferential treatment to each other. The word Antitrust is mentioned more than 20 times in the contract. The intent is pretty clear: they wanted to cut off a competing technology before it threatened their market domination. In the newly unsealed documents, a Google employee states that they wanted to “kill” header bidding. All this was done under the name Jedi Blue – not exactly what Luke Skywalker would have wanted.

Jason Kint, CEO of Digital Content Next, savaged the two companies for these practices:

“Under the cute label of Jedi Blue, the two largest advertising companies, who were already capturing most of the market and nearly all of the growth in the industry, had a secret deal between the top executives to allegedly rig the market,” said Kint. “Even non-techies can see that is a massive abuse of power.”

Only time will tell if Google and Facebook will face prosecution for these actions – though it could be a big turning point if some of these Silicon Valley giants actually face consequences under antitrust legislation.

By Josh Hamilton

Maxim Melamedov
Trouble is Brewing Cloud Paradise - 2023 Will Determine Company's Long-Term Plans for Cloud Use The relationship between developers and the cloud was practically love at first sight. For years, migration to the cloud in ...
Frank Suglia
Migrating Microsoft Office 2013 As of April 11, 2023, Microsoft will stop supporting Office 2013. The decision to end support for Office 2013 should come as no surprise. Over the past several years, Microsoft has ...
Steve Prentice
The Era of Microlearning Becoming employable and then staying employable requires ongoing, up to date knowledge, and this can become something of a dilemma. Many of us grew up with a traditional understanding of the ...
Gilad David Maayan
What is SASE (Secure Access Service Edge)? SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) is a term coined by Gartner to refer to a new architecture for networking and security that combines both functions into a single, ...
Stacey Farrar
Modern Auth and Exchange Online Migrations Microsoft has phased out Basic Authentication (Basic Auth), replacing it with Modern Authentication (Modern Auth) to provide increased protection and user security. Through this, Microsoft has turned off Basic ...
Patrick Melampy
Cloud On-Ramp and Protecting Performance The expansion of remote work and the massive growth in usage of cloud-based applications have stressed existing infrastructure and put a keen focus on the performance of everyone’s network environment ...
10 Leading Open Source Business Intelligence Tools
Open Source Business Intelligence Tools It’s impossible to take the right business decisions without having insightful information to back up the decision-making process. Open Source Business Intelligence Tools make it easier to have our raw ...
Drew Firment
Stop Focusing on Cloud Adoption and Start Focusing on Cloud Maturity For the past several years, most organizations have made it their priority to shift much of their applications and data from on-premises to the ...
Disaster Plan.png
Growing Up.png
Recovery Experts.png


Pluralsight provides online courses on popular programming languages and developer tools. Other courses cover fields such as IT security best practices, server infrastructure, and virtualization. 


(ISC)² provides IT training, certifications, and exams that run online, on your premises, or in classrooms. Self-study resources are available. You can also train groups of 10 or more of your employees.


CYBRARY Open source Cyber Security learning. The world's largest cyber security community. Cybrary provides free IT training certificates. Courses for beginners, intermediates, and advanced users are available.