Security Audits, Cyberattacks and other Potential Front Line Issues

Defending the Organization

When people talk about security audits in an organization, thoughts immediately go to malware, cyberattacks and other front line issues. These appear as the most obvious types of threats and are consequently given the greatest attention. As essential as these responses are, companies need additional layers of audit and defence further up the hierarchy if they are to build a culture of perpetual and successful self-governance. The problem is, internal compliance and control – the key elements of self-governance – are falling woefully behind the times thanks to traditions that have not yet received a full overhaul. This is bad news for business in the private and public sectors, since the enemies they face have already stepped up to the speed of “now.”

Traditionally, businesses have relied upon three lines of defence for standing up against risk. Called the “Combined Assurance Model,” it relies first on line managers to watch over the business processes. The second line belongs to internal risk managers and assurance providers, and then thirdly comes the internal and external auditors.

Such a structure has not always proven to be reliable. In 2013, Financial Times journalist Howard Davies quoted British lawmakers as suggesting the model “promoted a wholly misplaced sense of security.” He added, “Far from complementing each other as happy teammates, they think the second and third lines are in the chocolate teapot category of uselessness, with “the front line, remunerated for revenue generation, dominant over the compliance risk and audit apparatus.” 

These are the types of issues that worry Shrikant Deshpande, senior banking technology, risk and assurance professional and (ISC)2 Certified Cloud Security Professional. He suggests there seems to be a gap between Internal Audit, GRC (Governance, Risk management, and Compliance) and Cyber Security in terms of formalized methods of defining risks, monitoring and assurance. “There is certainly a meeting of minds and policy level agreement on objectives,” he states, “however a formal process of risk mapping and traceability of assurance outcomes to agreed high level risk needs to improve.

What this means in the most straightforward terms is that audit and GRC education must keep up with the times, and with the new technologies now impacting business globally, like cloud, big data and IoT. There needs to be greater investment in security monitoring technologies and in internal education, and this requires getting through to Executive decision makers in a way that effectively conveys both urgency and importance.

Shrikant highlights the recommendations of a 2010 research paper published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, outlining a process of continuous assurance for the digital world. Central to its thesis was the notion of “better matching internal and external auditing practices to the reality of the IT-enabled world, to provide stakeholders with more timely assurance.” The authors advocate “audit automation,” to move the audit process away from a “manual, periodic paradigm” to something more real-time.

Shrikant points out that a variety of cloud technology neutral assurance methods and processes already exist, such as COBIT, ISO 27k , ISO 30k, and NIST. The challenge is that audit and GRC professionals need to mature their skills and knowledge to apply these in specific technology environments like the cloud.

This is where a combination of techniques like assurance mapping, combined assurance and continuous auditing can coexist and assist.

He adds, “the gap between risk management stakeholders and those who are actually monitoring risk and creating assurance continues to exist. There is a legacy of division that must be overcome if businesses and organizations hope to thrive in the extremely fast-paced world of cyber-connected business.” His advice: formally engage. Organizations need formal programs, formal assurance mapping and an up-to-speed monitoring program. The luxury of waiting no longer exists.

For more on the CCSP certification from (ISC)2, please visit their website. Sponsored by (ISC)2.

By Steve Prentice

The Manuscript.png
Data Fallout.png
It’s Magic
Growing Up.png
Kelly Dyer
Healthcare Data Security Today, electronic healthcare data exists at every point along a patient’s journey. So frequently is it being processed, accessed, and shared between multiple providers, that we’d be forgiven for forgetting the highly ...
Gary Bernstein
Intruder Vulnerability Tool Alternatives There are many Intruder alternative names on the market, but which one is the best for your cloud security needs? Intruder is a popular web application security testing tool, and it ...
Ronald van Loon
The future of our world will be built on a new universe of connectivity as seen through extended reality (XR), the metaverse, and enterprise applications. Advanced network capabilities and 5G will bring to life a ...
RPA-Data
Accelerate Data Migration by 2X Ongoing trends in the Telco/DSP industry such as M&As, migration of the application to the cloud, and modernization of legacy applications have increased the frequency and scope of data migration ...
Louis
Devops teams are sacrificing focus on security gate reviews to meet tight time-to-market deadlines amid growing pressure to deliver digital transformation and digital-first revenue projects ahead of schedule. Compensation plans for CIOs, devops leaders, and their teams prioritize time-to-market performance, ...